THE BIG MONEY OF THE MORNING-AFTER PILL

Since the introduction of the morning-after pills in the United States and then in France in 2000, the dealers try to impose their drug in many countries.
The synchronization of the promotion campaigns all over the world and the huge amounts of money invested indicate that the diffusion of the abortifacient pill called the morning-after pill represents for them a major issue.

They did not have any difficulty in imposing the abortifacient drug in the occidental de-christianized countries such as Belgium, Canada, Portugal, Spain, Italy, South Africa, etc.
The methods vary but the sought goal is always to deliver the drug free to minor young women, without a prescription nor medical control, and without parents' authorization.
The UN agencies also flog this merchandise to peoples in distress due to wars and natural disasters.

But pro-abortion people must have paid bribes or important subsidies to many political heads of different countries having laws against abortion. That is probably the reason why countries such as Colombia, Uganda, Guatemala, Mexico, Chile and Ireland accept the abortifacient drug all of a sudden.
However, there are points of resistance to the cartel of the abortifacient drug.

in Great Britain, our friends of the SPUC (Society for the Protection of Unborn Children) have understood that they would not be credible in the fight against abortion unless they do not denounce also the abortions caused by «contraceptives». They have lodged an appeal against the distribution of the drug, on the grounds that it does not respect the abortion law of the year 1967 and that it causes an involuntary abortion, which is illegal. The lawsuit is set for 2.12.2002. This does not hinder the ASA (Advertising Standards Authority) from trying to censure the publications of our English friends, on the pretext that the English government does not believe the abortifacient aspect of the morning-after pills...

in Chile, the marketing of the morning-after pill since March 2001 has been questioned before Court. The Supreme Court sustained our friends' claim and prohibited its sale by the end of August, because the drug is abortifacient and therefore it infringes the Chilean Constitution. This is not convenient for the WHO that fears the extension of this prohibition to the IUD's (another abortifacient) and of the Chilean government that wants to produce the same drug abroad under another name: it obtained a favorable decision from the Court of Appeal on October 11, and reinstated on October 12. Our friends are preparing a legal reply against this arrogant government...

the Catholic Church extensively condemns the use of the morning-after pills, which it considers abortifacient. So does the Anglican church. As well as the English Muslims...

The propaganda in favor of the morning-after pill claims that it diminishes the number of abortions, but experience shows that now the number of surgical abortions has not decreased and chemical abortions caused by these drugs have to be added to the former; not to mention the increase of sexual promiscuity. All this was foreseeable and there is no doubt that the real purposes of promoters of abortifacient drugs are actually to:

corrupt the young to manipulate the more easily,

obtain the legalization of abortion where it has not been legalized yet,

increase the number of abortions.

In France several pro-life doctors said they had doubts as to the abortifacient effects of the morning-after pill Norlevo; but the doubt should lead us to the principle of precaution. However, the best specialists insist on the abortifacient nature of the morning-after pills.
On the other hand it is surprising to see that French doctors remain silent as to the abortifacient effects of the so called «contraceptive» pills. Talking about it would be politically incorrect, they would risk frightening the clients, but from the scientific point of view it is a solid statement. Thus, there are several negative reactions to our publication on the Internet about this subject; but these reactions are in general insults or authoritarian affirmations, never are they justifiable or intelligent arguments.

Perhaps we should wait for the result of the process of the victims of these drugs. Thus, in Great Britain, 122 families of victims (dead or left disabled for life) of the 3^rd generation pills (those supposed to have the least harmful effects) have initiated judicial proceedings against 3 manufacturers...